Evolution vs creationism: complexity


Many creationists argue that the complexity of advanced organisms is proof that a creator exists, because only a deity could have created something so complicated.
In reality, that's not true. If anything, complexity is rather a sign of the absence of a plan, not of its presence. Evolution proceeds without a plan, without even a goal, through tiny, incremental steps of adaptation over extremely long stretches of time, adding one piece at a time at random, with no direction.

That's exactly why evolution so often ends up producing solutions that are absurdly complex.
If there were a creator devoted to efficiency, you'd expect the same functions to be carried out by structures simpler than the ones we find in nature — which are outsized, redundant, almost ridiculous in their complexity.
So the complexity typical of certain structures in nature can't be used as conclusive proof of the creationist hypothesis. 

Drafted from Italian with Blog Translator, then revised by me.

Comments

Most popular shreds (so to speak)

On the black hill - Bruce Chatwin

AirAsia: not so cool anymore

Panic exponential function - Shanghai, China