The revenge of the humanists
A couple of years ago, when the AI debate was raging only in certain circles and was not yet global, I read a statement that made me think a lot. I don't remember where I found it, but I don't want to present it as if it were my own anyway.
It went something like this: "The only profession that will remain untouched by the current technological revolution is that of the ethics expert." Yes, you read that right, ethics expert, I am talking precisely about moral philosophers.
In fact, the only thing we will need to continue providing to AI agents, without them sorting it out themselves, will be the moral perimeter within which they must operate: the tables of commandments, a manifesto, the rulebook. They can do the rest on their own.
When I was a boy, people used to say: "Go study engineering, medicine, economics, law, at least physics or political science, so at least you'll find a job. What the hell are you studying philosophy for? Do you want to end up unemployed giving lectures to drunks in a tavern?"
And here we are. The lecturer for drunks, the one who out of passion chose the "losing" faculty, will be the new super executive with a million-dollar severance package. And we smart alecks who got the "right" degrees will have to hope that universal income isn't just a meager handout.
This post was machine-translated from Italian.

Comments